|
|
Post by Giants GM (A) - Blue Jays co on Nov 21, 2009 14:47:50 GMT -5
Wow. I am so glad i didnt trade Lee. He got a much better projection then i thought he would have.
His hits per 9 are lower then anytime in his career and his Ks per nine are higher then his career best.
Does anyone else have any thoughts? Is this strictly because he is in the NL now. Even his projected ERA is lower then the actual ERA he put up while in the NL
|
|
|
|
Post by Texas (A) on Nov 21, 2009 15:37:31 GMT -5
I have to believe a lot is due to projected entire year in NL; also Phillies are projected to be a relatively better fielding team than the Indians were; don't discount the value of fielding.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrosgm on Nov 21, 2009 15:50:15 GMT -5
Im looking forward to Tommy Hanson's projection..id have to go with something along the lines of 14-12 3.79 ERA 155.3 IP 145+ Ks? Close?
|
|
|
|
Post by NatsGM on Nov 22, 2009 20:32:49 GMT -5
Well i know I was expecting a better projection for JA Happ. Im curious about Hanson too.
|
|
|
|
Post by O's GM on Nov 22, 2009 21:26:55 GMT -5
I knew what Happ was going to get, since ZIPS cares about FIP and not ERA, and Happ's FIP was like 4 on '09. Hanson's FIP was stellar in both AAA and the MLB, and it looks for similar players, and in the case of youngsters that often means players who took big steps forward. I could see Hanson with a Zips FIP of anywhere from 3.5-4.2, depending on how bad they see Atlanta's D, as I don't know which starting OF'ers it will base it off of.
|
|
